
Change of Bank Details
Designing a secure, accessible pension journey using GDS standards
APRIL - MAY 2026
3 PERSON TEAM - PRODUCT OWNER & MYSELF
MY ROLE
-
End-to-end UX design
-
GDS alignment and design system application
-
Content design (plain English)
-
Journey mapping and flow creation
-
Stakeholder collaboration
PROJECT OVERVIEW
I designed a Change of Bank Details MVP for a digital pension platform (COMET), transforming a traditionally paper-heavy process into a clear, self‑service digital journey.
The key focus was to apply GOV.UK (GDS) design principles and design system components to create a service that is:
-
Simple and easy to follow
-
Accessible for older members
-
Secure and trustworthy
-
Consistent across the end-to-end journey
The Problem
Changing bank details in pensions is a high-risk, high-friction journey.
Users often experience:
-
Complex forms and unclear instructions
-
Lack of confidence in whether changes were successful
-
Confusing verification requirements
-
Heavy reliance on letters and manual processes
-
This leads to user anxiety, errors, and increased operational effort.
User Need (GDS-led)
-
Following GDS, I defined the core need:
-
“As a pension member, I want to securely update my bank details online, so I can be confident my payments go to the correct account.”
-
This drove all design decisions:
-
-
Reduce cognitive load
-
Provide reassurance at every step
-
Make security clear but not overwhelming
-
Design Approach: Applying GDS Principles
I deliberately aligned the solution to key GDS principles:
âś… Start with user needs
-
Broke down the journey into simple, sequential steps
-
Removed unnecessary or duplicated inputs
​
âś… Make things simple and intuitive
-
Linear flow (no branching complexity in MVP)
-
One question per page
​
âś… Use plain English
-
Clear headings like:
-
“Change your bank details”
-
“Check your bank details”
-
-
Avoided jargon (replaced technical terms with guidance)
​
âś… Be consistent (GOV.UK patterns)
-
Reused recognised patterns:
-
Back link
-
Form inputs
-
Error summary
-
Radio button questions
-
Confirmation screen
-
​
âś… Build trust and transparency
-
Clear validation messages
-
Confirmation with case reference
-
Explanation of what happens next
Using the GOV.UK Design System
The experience was designed using the Comet Design System, a UI toolkit built on the foundations of the GOV.UK Design System (GDS). Comet follows established component standards, accessibility guidance, and regulatory requirements, ensuring that all designs align with best practices for usability and inclusion.
Key components used:
-
Back link
→ Helps users recover easily without losing progress
​​
-
Error summary + inline validation
→ Clearly highlights issues (e.g. missing sort code or account number)
​
-
Form fields (input + hint text)
→ Structured data entry (sort code, account number) -
→ Guidance text placed directly above fields
​
-
Radio buttons
→ Used for simple decisions (account type, confirmation step)
​
-
File upload component
→ Supports document verification in a familiar pattern
​
-
Primary / secondary buttons
→ “Continue” vs “Cancel” clearly differentiated
​
-
Confirmation panel
→ Strong visual feedback on successful submission
End-to-End Journey (What I Designed)
1. Entry point (Dashboard)
-
Users access the journey from: “View and change bank details”
👉 Follows GDS principle:
-
start from a clear user action
.png)
2. Before you begin (Guidance page)
Explains:
-
What details are needed
-
UK vs overseas requirements
-
When to update (timing considerations)
​
👉 Applies:
-
Plain English
-
Clear content hierarchy
-
Task-focused design

3. Account type selection
Simple radio selection:
-
UK bank
-
Building society
-
Overseas account
​
👉 Uses standard GDS selection pattern

4. Enter bank details
-
Sort code
-
Account number
-
Validation rules clearly shown
​
👉 Key GDS patterns:
-
Input validation
-
Inline error messaging
-
Error summary at top

.png)
5. Check your answers
-
Clear summary of entered details
-
Yes / No confirmation
​
👉 GDS principle:
-
Help users check before submission

6. Upload documents
-
File upload component
-
Clear requirements (file type, size, recency)
-
Upload status feedback (Uploading / Uploaded)
​
👉 Enhances:
-
Transparency
-
Trust in verification


7. Confirmation screen
-
“Successfully updated” message
-
Case reference number
-
What happens next
​
👉Critical GDS pattern:
-
Closure and reassurance
Accessibility Considerations (GDS-aligned)
Design decisions intentionally support:
-
Older users (80+)
-
Low digital confidence users
-
Neurodiverse users
Implemented through:
-
Simple sentence structures
-
Clear visual hierarchy
-
Generous spacing
-
Consistent layout across pages
-
Avoidance of dense forms
Key Design Decisions
1. One task per page
Reduces overwhelm and improves completion rate
2. Strong error handling
-
Clearly visible
-
Explained in plain English
-
Linked directly to fields
​
3. Reassurance at critical points
-
Before submission
-
After submission
-
During document upload
​
4. Consistency across screens
Users always know:
-
Where they are
-
What to do next
Outcome & Value
This MVP demonstrates how a regulated, risk-heavy process can be simplified using GDS principles.​
Business & user value:
-
​Reduces reliance on paper processes​
-
Improves user confidence and completion rates
-
Lowers support queries
-
Provides a scalable foundation for further automation
What I’d Improve Next
-
Real-time bank validation (MVP2)
-
Progress indicator (multi-step tracker)
-
Save and return later
-
Status tracking after submission
Summary
By applying GDS principles and GOV.UK design patterns, I transformed a complex and high-risk process into a clear, accessible, and user-centred digital journey.
The MVP shows how consistency, simplicity, and trust-building design can significantly improve pension experiences.